Astronomy and ancient eclipse art – Is it a science?
(written in 2011/2 by Zoltan Andrew Simon, updated in 2013)
(about the author)
Zoltan A. Simon (64) is a geologist and land surveyor with diplomas, a Canadian Hungarian amateur scholar. His research of 35 years concentrates on the absolute dates of the ancient word, mainly chronology. He is the author
of “Absolute Dates for Ancient China by Astronomy” (Berlin, Rhombos Verlag, 2007), and “Origin and Remnants of the Dialects in England” (Journal of Language and Linguistics, Volume 2, Issue 2, New York, 2003: 323-359).
He authored a few published books, articles, compiled a polyglot dictionary of 116 languages, and took part in several broadcast interviews through CBC. He was an editor and proofreader of the Calgary-based “Encyclopaedia Hungarica” for
a decade after 1985. He worked in the civil engineering field for twenty years in British Columbia and Toronto, including by AutoCAD. Address: 6 Rutherford Drive, Red Deer, Alberta, Canada T4P 6G9. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
There are many books on archaeology with photographs showing crescents of
strange shape. Experts interpreted such representations as religious art depicting the Moon’s crescent with gods or goddesses. The author feels that most of those explanations are superficial and incorrect since they usually show royal courts, astronomical
events, and solar crescents during annular eclipses. Further, two eccentric circles on the sky may indicate total-annular eclipses of the Sun on the stelae, thus may offer solid absolute dates for ancient Near Eastern kings.
The main purpose of this paper is to encourage the advancement of the sciences on a no-man’s land between astronomy, archaeology, history, and chronology. For example, astronomers could utilize improved Delta-T figures related to Earth’s palaeorotation,
taken from ancient solar eclipse records. (The Delta-T is the clock-time error caused by the slowing rotation of our planet.) A large number of new and reliable astronomical absolute dates could improve the half-life figure in the radiocarbon dating method,
and effect dendrochronology as well.
This paper is limited to a brief description of several unusual crescent-shaped forms on ancient stelae, tablets, and cylinder seal impressions.
They are from ancient Mesopotamia and the Near East, but our last paragraphs refer to Roman coins with similar design as well.
Ancient Eclipse Art in the Near/Middle East
entire interdisciplinary concept and the related research began by seeing a photograph of King Esarhaddon’s stele found at Zincirli (Sam’al), in Turkey. It shows two eccentric circles in the sky, a circle inside a larger one, touching each other
above (our Figure 1 M-N). This is a rare combination in real life and not really a decorative motif. The photo made an instant impression on the author that it had been a design commemorating an annular-total solar eclipse seen there. A long search in books
and articles yielded many similar “records.” The more interesting ones are tabulated in Figure 1. At some of them we inserted a similar real configuration, usually from the nearest such eclipse, computed by the WinEclipse software.
Generally speaking, there is an almost unbroken tradition regarding this specific “eclipse art” in Western Asia, since about 2000 BC in Ur. However, regarding about a hematite cylinder seal from the Old Babylonian Dynasty, experts wrote, “This
is a return to prototypes of the mid-third millennium BC.” In many of the cases, the motif already appears as a widespread symbol, just like a conventional sign on a modern map. Here we do not claim that every ancient eclipse art item would be a true
and accurate representation of an actual solar eclipse. Each one may depend on specific circumstances. For instance, if the artist, painter or sculptor did not see the eclipse but resorted to the descriptions of other observers, his work would likely be inaccurate.
If a king had a chance to observe the eclipse by the help of a court astronomer – maybe through dark glass – the artist was probably obliged to follow the ruler’s sketch or description. The ruler and the priests may have had a primitive astronomical
tool to watch eclipses: some of the cylinder seals depict a vertical bar standing on a base, with a semicircle on the top. It may have served to insert a circular dark glass or other semi-translucent optical aid, like a polished thin disk of alabaster. Sometimes
an assisting minister seemed to hold such circular object on a rod, maybe in front of the king’s eyes during the eclipse. Pictures c and k on Plate XXVII in Frankfort depict these ritual tools or instruments that are often shown. The
king may have dressed as Shamash, the sun god, during the ceremonies.
Porada, Frankfort, Moortgat, Ascalone, McCown and Haines published many illustrations of Old Babylonian cylinder seal impressions.
(See our Figure 2.) Several of those depict the Sun and the Moon in conjunction. Erich Lessing’s Photo Archive shows more amongst 2137 images by “Ancient Orient” search. Strangely, the majority of the designs depict the Sun covering most
of the Moon’s disk – or its own disk – that are astronomically impossible. One can see this more clearly on a stele in the Musée du Louvre, also in Figure 2R. It can be associated this schematic symbolism with a Mexican drawing
in the Codex Telleriano-Remensis on Figure 2P: “eclipse del sol – tierra eclipsada” (solar eclipse – Earth eclipsed). It shows that the sun covered part of a huge stone (the Earth or Moon) about the death of Chimalpopoca, referring
to the solar eclipse of 30 October 1426 CE. In Mesopotamia, the main issue was the conflict of the Sun with the Moon, depicted only by a general symbol for eclipses. Many kings simply copied such nice symbols used by the previous rulers. In general, depicting
the darkness of a total solar eclipse may pose utter difficulties for a modern painter as well.
An impression of the cylinder seal (WA 134757) of Sin-Ishmeanni – son of King Sin-Iddinam of Larsa – shows him standing before his enthroned
master, Sumu-Yamutbal, who holds a cup. A dwarf stands between them and a praying priest or priestess behind. A cylinder seal in the Metropolitan Museum of Art depicts King Ibbi-Sin’s official, Ilum-bani. The king is holding a cup under the eclipsed
It is hard to tell whether the following designs show stylized or true eclipses: a stele of Ur-Nammu of Ur, Ilishkautul’s cylinder seal (named WA 130695) under Erra-imitti’s rule, stele of Dadusha from the days of Shamshi-Adad I’s
death, etc. On Ur-Nammu’s stele, the complete Sun with its own long crescent underneath could be a hint to the two shapes of the same celestial body. They may remind us to a modern series of astronomers’ stop motion photographs taken of the different
phases of an eclipse, displayed together.
A Canaanite stele of Hazor in Israel clearly shows an annular total eclipse and two hands raised in prayer towards the Sun. It may be dated to either 8 October 1764 or 28 April 1635 BC. The next similar
phenomenon was visible from Hazor only in the twelfth century BC.
The kudurrus (boundary stones) of Melishipak and Nazimaruttash, Nabu-apla-iddina’s “Sippar Tablet” named ME 91000-91004, and a stele (ME 90834) in the British
Museum, erected by Marduk-balassu-iqbi, all depict Babylonian eclipses of the Sun. Annular-total eclipses are quite rare and excellent for absolute dating purposes.
King Melishipak’s kudurru contains many of the mysterious cultic elements
of the cylinder seals. Wikipedia shows its both sides under “Meli-Shipak II.” The simpler side of the monument includes a standing ornate column, with a spearhead-shaped triangular thing at its top, in front of the sitting ruler. This cultic object
is frequently recurring on the cylinder seals. The more crowded scene on the other side of the stone shows standing monsters and winged lions, a laying animal (a statue?) with straight long horns like those of a gazelle. These are common motifs on the seals
as well. The fork-like symbol with a U-shape recurs on Ashur-nasirpal II’s stele, perhaps referring to lightning. Another recurring motif, maybe an astronomical tool or cult item, is a wedge- or crutch-shaped standing object, usually with a semi-circular
hump about its middle. The ruler often holds a chaplet with prayer beads – of Oriental origin – to count the number of prayers. A round wine-jar, a small naked girl, a rhombus- or vulva-shaped item, bull-men, or purification of a man by water appears
in several pictures.
Governor Bel-Harran-bel(i)-usur was a palace herald during the reign of Shalmaneser IV. He occupied that office from the reign of Adad-nirari III onwards. He erected a stele for his new city – near the modern Tel Abta
– built in the desert. Later, probably after the governor’s death, Tiglath-pileser III made revisions or additions in the text of the stele. (An eponym under the late reign of Tiglath-pileser III may have been a later namesake of the governor in
question.) This artistic monument named AM 1326 apparently depicts an annular-total eclipse seen at Tel Abta. Gaston Maspero and J. Pritchard also published drawings of this stele in their books.
King Adad-nirari III’s Tell al-Rimah stele named
IM 70543 commemorates a large partial eclipse of the Sun. The large dots represent the “Seven Evil Spirits,” “Seven Judges” or “Seven Stars” (the Pleiades) above the Sun. They refer to an “eclipse”, originally
of the Moon, in the Assyrian vernacular: “against its face the Seven advanced.” Therefore, it is not necessary to search for a major solar eclipse during which the Pleiades would have stood near the Moon. According to the stele, a bright star was
apparently visible during the eclipse.
The partial annular eclipse of King Tiglath-pileser III, on 9 December 744 BC, is depicted at Nimrud. This drawing, originally from Layard, is not widely known.
The Kurkh stele of King Shalmaneser III, related
to his battle at Qarqar, depicts a partial eclipse of the Sun. The partial solar eclipse on Ashur-nasirpal II’s stele is similar.
A few eclipse art items may depict either solar or lunar crescents. For instance, a stele of King Nabonidus of Babylon
is clearly related to a Sin (Moon) temple. In this case, the crescent obviously means the Moon.
Based on the names and catalogue numbers in museums, mentioned above and shown here, it is relatively easy to find some related photographs on the Internet
by Google search. (Please refer to our Figures 1-2.)
A cylinder seal from Nippur and another one from the First Babylonian Dynasty (Frankfort’s Plate XXVIIg)
show extremely thin lines remaining from the eclipsed Sun. In addition, both of them depict a small creature in front of the king holding a cup. We find three Old Babylonian seals in Table G of Moortgat depicting a sitting king holding a cup. Two of them are
associated with the eclipse symbol. (The ruler may have needed a cup of wine to strengthen his heart during a fearful eclipse.) On the other hand, at another scene – Plate 111.10 of McCown – the crescent is very thick, possibly showing an eclipsed
Sun with a magnitude of only 70% or so. Thus, the thickness of the Sun’s remaining crescent varies on the cylinder seals.
A paper entitled “Rituals for
an eclipse possibility in the 8th year of Cyrus” mentions the playing on a copper kettledrum during a lunar eclipse. Our stelae and cylinder seals do not seem to depict any drum at solar eclipses. However, before a predicted total lunar eclipse,
often a substitute king was appointed. Thus, the fury of heaven and the death of the real Assyrian king were averted by the enthronement of that substitute king who was sacrificed, perhaps during the eclipse. The head of a man shown near the eclipsed Sun may
refer to the head of the decapitated substitute king, here due to an ancient solar eclipse.
symbol – the solar disk above its own crescent – was quite unknown in other regions, except Ugarit and Syria where the Egyptian and Mesopotamian influences met and their elements formed a combination. The “ankh” (life)
sign meant Egyptian influence. Plates to The Cambridge Ancient History show the “dynastic seal” of Ugarit: a replica of the seal of Yakuru, son of Niqmaddu, king of Ugarit from the early second millennium BC. Ben-Tor shows a Syrian-style
cylinder seal from Canaan: the common scene with an “ankh” cross, two sphinx-like winged lions, and a – possibly domesticated – lion clawing a gazelle-like animal.
Two cylinder seals from Mari are dated before Hammurabi’s reign. The older one, described as Aleppo 6296 (M 1400), depicts a sitting ruler holding a long knife or saw-sword but no sacrificial animal is visible. The second seal, named Aleppo 1571 (M 1004)
shows a sitting king with a dagger (?) in his hand. A minister or priest in front of him brings a small animal for sacrifice. The ruler sometimes holds a double-axe in his hand. Plate XXXVI/3 of Jastrow is a seal impression showing an almost complete solar
crescent, similar to Esarhaddon’s Zincirli stele. André Parrot (figures 8-9 on page 96ff) has similar crescents of the Sun where the Pleiades and a star were visible – supposedly during an eclipse.
Some researchers believe that the drawings of winged solar disks refer to total eclipses where the solar prominences appeared like wings. If the winged sun disk was associated with major solar eclipses in Mesopotamia, as on pictures I and J of Figure 1 or
B-G-H of Figure 2, this rule would apply for Egypt, too. In Egypt, the corresponding eclipse art was present mainly in the form of winged sun disks surrounded by one or two serpents, sometimes with the “ankh” symbol. In most of the paintings,
the Sun was red, defined by a single line. In a few cases, its border was a double line that may represent annular-total eclipses. Alternatively, maybe the outer circle represented the limits of the Sun’s halo, the corona. In many traditions, huge serpents
(Egyptians, Mayans) or dragons (Chinese) caused the eclipses by eating up the Sun. This was practically an international motif.
Ahmose I, first king of the 18th Dynasty,
depicted such concentric circles on the (CM CG34002) funeral stele from the cenotaph of his grandmother Tetisheri(t) at Abydos. See Figure 2Q. Archaeologists date it to the second half of his rule. In the Middle Chronology, this event may correspond to an
annular-total eclipse of the Sun in 1562 BC. Other candidates between 1750 and 1350 BC are 1710, 1689, 1646, 1635, 1601, 1508, 1410, and 1389 BC. These were annular eclipses, while total eclipses occurred in 1741, 1533, 1523, 1478, and 1352 BC.
The “Sphinx Stela” of Pharaoh Thutmosis IV is dated to ca. 1390 BC, using the Middle Chronology. A huge winged sun disk with concentric circles, surrounded by two cobras, dominates the scene. It seems to depict an annular-total eclipse. More interestingly,
one can find a corresponding annular-total eclipse of the Sun on 9 February 1389 BC in Egypt. Therefore, it is quite possible that the painting depicts a real eclipse of the Sun.
in Egypt, the notions “horizon” and the “eclipse” have a close relationship, perhaps because solar eclipses near the horizon were visible by the naked eye. One of the two hieroglyphs is the solar disc touching the horizon between two
rounded mountains. Seth was the god of darkness, chaos and confusion – that probably included major solar eclipses. An Egyptian researcher is claiming that the Sed-festivals (or heb-sed) were associated with eclipses and rejuvenation
of the Sun’s and Pharaoh’s power. We are of the opinion that he is correct, so studies of those festivals may eventually lead to a reliable Egyptian absolute chronology.
As a by-product, such identifications of several eclipses in ancient times could help astronomers to get more accurate Delta-T figures. Those values, in turn, would reveal us the parameters that define the palaeorotation of our planet, contributing to the
research of the long-term variation of the rotation rate of Earth.
Solar eclipses on ancient coins
Some coins on the Internet (Nebel) at are interesting. The obverse of an L. Lucretius Trio denarius from c.
76 BC (cat. #274) apparently depicts the solar eclipse of 6 March 78 BC in Rome. Its magnitude was 85.79% so perhaps seven “stars” (Vega, Arcturus, Capella and four planets) became visible.
Two other catalogues (Sear and Tkalec) contain
a coin showing a crescent of about 270 degrees in extent: if we draw two lines to each cusp from the origin of the larger circle – the Sun – the two lines would form a right angle. Therefore, these coins do not depict the Moon but definitely the
Sun. (In case of the Moon’s crescent, the circle’s origin would lay on the connecting line.) The coin’s description is: “P. Clodius Turrinus, AR denarius, (3.41g) 42 BC, Radiate head of Sol right, quiver behind. / Crescent moon and
five stars, P CLODIVS M F below...” This is a Roman coin minted by Clodius Turrinus, allegedly in c. 42 or 43 BC. Its catalogue no. is 274 in Tkalec. For us the most interesting is a great similarity between the coin’s solar crescent and the identical
shape of the Sun’s eclipsed disk on 7 March 51 BC. Perhaps the gap of 8-9 years is explicable because that unique sight had a deep effect on Clodius and he always remembered the pattern. That eclipse had a maximum magnitude of 82.93% there, so Jupiter,
Venus, Mars, Vega, and Capella may have been visible. Many authorities claim that “stars” would be visible only over m=90%.
Jarus refers to a comment on a Greek coin of Antiochos VIII that perhaps depicts an occultation of planet Jupiter
by the Moon on January 17, 121 BC. The excellent Sky View Café astronomy software on the Internet does not show occultation on that night, although Jupiter appeared within a lunar diameter from the Moon’s disk. (We used the same program for the
previous two paragraphs.)
Saslaw and Murdin refer to a possible solar eclipse shown on an ancient coin of Istros on the western shore of the Black Sea. We are of the opinion that it depicts the eclipse of 14 July 337 BC.
can do your own research
The most scholarly way for readers less familiar with astronomy and eclipses is to study the books of Professor Stephenson and others. In addition, the WinEclipse astronomy software copyrighted by Scsibrany
is extremely useful in viewing ancient eclipses. In the present article, we have used his program. Sometimes we printed out the shape of the darkened Sun from a similar eclipse in the decades in question, seen at the same geographical location. (You may type
in the – positive or negative – year or an interval, the latitude and longitude of the observation point, and the speed of the animation. You may even modify the recommended value of the Delta-T, the correction for the clock-time error usually
expressed in seconds.
The user-friendly Sky View Café is very simple and straightforward, a lots of fun to learn.
Finally, the readers can always refer to the extremely useful academic publication of Kelley and Milone as a handbook
It remains to be seen whether any of these suggested eclipse representations would ever become useful for scholars. Many of them may claim that eclipse art items should be regarded as curious freaks of (human) nature, mere coincidences.
Similar opinion ruled about fossils two centuries ago, as devil’s creations in order to mislead the believers. Then, it was claimed that fossilized seashells found in the Himalayas proved that Noah’s flood once had covered those mountains. Mainstream
scholars held both conclusions to be hasty and superficial. However, those “freaks” laid the foundations of a new science in those days: palaeontology, the study of prehistoric life.
The present author understands that there are at least four competing chronologies from “High” to “Super-short” for the ancient world. He is reluctant to take sides in this article in order to keep the peace between the rivals. Thus,
authorities could pick eclipse candidates that would fit their theories or chronological systems the most harmoniously.
A serious difficulty about the subject of this paper is that it belongs to a “no man’s land” in the sciences. An
astronomy editor may shift it to an archaeology publisher because it contains a lot of archaeology. An archaeology editor would likely push it to an astronomy publisher because it has nothing to do with archaeological digging and it contains a lot of astronomy.
Chronology does not have tenured scholars and officially does not exist. Thus, one may be concerned that there would be no quick advancement in this scientific vacuum for many years, until professors and faculties of chronology would be appointed in the universities.
Ascalone, E. 2007. Mesopotamia. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Ben-Tor, A. 1992. The Archaeology of Ancient Israel. New Haven and London: Yale
Bienkowski, P., and A. Millard (eds). 2000. Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press.
British Museum, Highlights. Web. http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights.aspx
[The] Center for Online Judaic Studies. 2011. Tel Al Rimah Stele. Web. http://cojs.org/cojswiki/Tel_Al_Rimah_Stele,_797_BCE
Chavalas, M. W. (ed). 2006. The Ancient Near
East. Malden – Oxford – Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
Cheng, J., and M. H. Feldman (eds). 2007. Ancient Near Eastern Art in Context: Studies in Honor of Irene J. Winter. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Dodson, A., and D.
Hilton. 2004. The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson.
Douglas, J. D., and N. Hillyer (eds). 1980. The Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Volume 2. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press.
Ebeling, E., B.
Meissner, D. O. Edzard, et al. (eds). 1998-2001. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie: Nab-Nuzi, Vol. 9. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
[Exhibition Catalogue without authors]. 1985. Da Ebla a Damasco:
Diecimila Anni di Archeologia in Siria. Milano: Electa.
Frankfort, H. 1971. Cylinder Seals. London: Macmillan and Co.
Jarus, O. 2011. 2,100 year-old Greek coin may have marked rare astronomical event. Unreported Heritage News.
Jastrow, M. Jr. 1915. The Civilization of Babylonia and Assyria. Philadelphia and London: J.B. Lippincott. Web. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028554271
Kelley, D. H., and E. F. Milone; Foreword by A. F. Aveni. 2005. Exploring Ancient Skies: An Encyclopedic Survey of Archaeoastronomy. New York: Springer.
Leick, G. 1999. Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East. London: Routledge.
Lessing Photo Archive. Without year. Vienna. Web. http://www.lessing-photo.com
Malraux, A., and G. Salles, G. (eds)., Gilbert, S., and J. Emmons, J. (translators). 1961. Sumer, the Dawn
of Art. New York: Golden Press.
Margueron, J.-C. 1965. Mesopotamia. London: Frederick Muller Limited.
Matthiae, P. Ninive. 1998. Milano: Electa–Elemond Editori Associati.
McCown, D. E., and R. C. Haines. 1967.
Nippur I: Temple of Enlil, Scribal Quarter, and Soundings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moortgat, A. 1967. Die Kunst des Alten Mesopotamien. Cologne/Köln: Verlag M. DuMont Schauberg.
Nebel, J. D. 2007. Ancient
Money. Web. www.ancientmoney.org/rr/lucretius_trio.html
Parrot, A. 1958. Babylon and the Old Testament. London: SCM Press.
Porada, E. 1947. Mesopotamian
Art in Cylinder Seals of the Pierpont Morgan Library. New York: The Gallery Press.
Project Gutenberg. Web. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/17321/17321-h/images/256.jpg
Quiñones Keber, E. 1995. Codex Telleriano-Remensis: Ritual, Divination, and History in a Pictorial Aztec Manuscript. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Russell, J. M. From Nineveh to New York. 1997. New Haven and London:
Yale University Press.
Saslaw, W., and P. Murdin. 2004-5. The double heads of Istrus: the oldest eclipse on a coin? Journal for the History of Astronomy Vol. 36, Part 1, No. 122: 21-27. Web. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2005JHA....36...21S
Sayce, A. H. (ed). 1888. Records of the Past, 2nd series, Vol. I. London, S. Bagster and Sons. Web. http://www.sacred-texts.com/ane/rp/rp201/rp20111.htm
Scsibrany, H. 2005.
WinEclipse [downloadable software], 2005. Web. http://home.ccc.at/heinzscs/
Sear Roman Coins. 2000. Web. http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/sear5/s0491.t.html
Seidel, M., R. Schulz et al. 2005. Egypt. Cologne: Könemann.
Shetline, K. 2010-11. Sky View Café (SVC) astronomy software. Web. http://www.skyviewcafe.com/skyview.php
Stephenson, F. R. 1997. Historical Eclipses and Earth’s Rotation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tkalec AG. 2007. Ancient Coins. Web. http://www.dcatalog.de/pdf/TKALEC-4.pdf
Unger, E. 1917. Die Stele des Bel-Harran-Beli-Ussur ein Denkmal der Zeit Salmanassars IV. Constantinople: Ahmed Ihsan & Co.
Wikipedia, Ashurnasirpal II. Web. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashurnasirpal_II
[Without author]. 1935. L’Art de le Mésopotamie. Paris and New York: Éditions “Cahiers d’Art.
Woolley, C. L. 1961. Mesopotamia and the Middle East. London: Methuen.